Professional Role · Topic 20 of 21
Patient Education & Health Literacy
Patient Education & Health Literacy
Assume anyone may struggle with health information: speak and write plainly, then confirm understanding with teach-back — every patient, every time.
Confirm understanding with teach-back: the patient explains in their own words what they need to know or do ("I want to make sure I explained this clearly…"); if wrong, re-explain differently and recheck.
Use health literacy universal precautions — simplify communication and confirm understanding with everyone — because you cannot know who is struggling at any moment; even capable people falter when tired, sick or anxious.
Write patient materials at or below a 6th–8th-grade reading level (NIH: 6th grade or lower; AHRQ: 4th–6th); the average US adult reads at about an 8th–9th-grade level, and materials are often written far above it.
What it is
Core ideaCauses & risk factors
Why it happensTeaching children or teaching adults?
Commonly confused| Self-concept | Dependent on the teacher |
|---|---|
| Experience | Little to draw on |
| Orientation | Subject-centered |
| Need to know | Learn what they are told |
Teach & follow up
Patient educationMore detail
ReferenceShow 5 reference facts
Teach-back tests the teacher, not the patient: if the patient cannot explain it, re-explain it a different way and check again.
Sources · AHRQ Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit — Tool 5: Use the Teach-Back Method · AHRQ Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit, 3rd edition — Introduction (why universal precautions) · Institute for Healthcare Improvement — Ask Me 3: Good Questions for Your Good Health · CDC — Plain Language Materials & Resources (health literacy) · CDC — What Is Health Literacy? (Healthy People 2030 definitions) · National Institute on Aging — Talking With Your Older Patients (reviewed Jan 2023) · Knapke JM et al. Andragogy in practice: applying a theoretical framework to team science training. Br J Biomed Sci 2024;81:12651 (Table 1: Knowles' six principles) · Smith GB et al. Evaluating the readability of online patient education materials for avascular necrosis. J Patient Cent Res Rev 2026;13:108–114 (NIH ≤ 6th grade; average US reading level ≈ 8th grade) · Hayes DS et al. Readability, quality and source evaluation of online content on inherited pediatric orthopaedic conditions. J Pediatr Soc North Am 2026;17:100420 (recommended 6th–8th grade) · AHA Team Training — TeamSTEPPS Pocket Guide, Feb 2024 (teach-back as closed-loop communication with patients; return demonstration) · National Center for Education Statistics — National Assessment of Adult Literacy: Health Literacy results (2003) · AHRQ Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit — Tool 11: Assess, Select, and Create Easy-to-Understand Materials (average US adult reads at 8th–9th grade; 4th–6th grade recommended) · Starter sheet built from the verified AGACNP fact map (facts reviewed 2026-10-15).